Idea: To substitute a hard copy biannual magazine with a quarterly ezine to registered residents.
31 March 2009
Council newspaper/magazine
Enhancing ethnic access
This blog is working!
Saving on mealtime costs
Supporting the Voluntary Sector
"We make applications for CRB checks to our Council for Voluntary Service who can carry these out at a lower cost than statutory agencies such as the police, but the fees they receive, a small profit for them, pays for their employee to work every afternoon as well helping the voluntary sector."
Thanks to North Hertfordshire District Council for this example
Collaboration & double benefits
"We have negotiated sharing our grants database through a commercial organisation. By allowing the CVS rep to come along and log in at our offices, we were not only able to save them £1250 cost per year, which we would have funded otherwise, but they were also willing to use that experienced person to search grants for the council – a double benefit for us both."
Thanks to North Hertfordshire District Council for this example
Mobile working
"We have implemented mobile working, sending benefits assessors etc to the homes of our customers, meaning it removes the need for them to travel, means documents can be checked in the home rather than sent or brought to the office and officers’ reports are sent back to base electronically. That has already saved us around £70,000, no small amount."
Paperless ordering
"We have moved to a paperless ordering system, approving orders on line, which has reduce paper, print and mail costs significantly – that is hosted by the IDeA as part of their marketplace project."
30 March 2009
Weigh less!
26 March 2009
The Big Switch Off
The event gained greater coverage due to support from the radio station Reading 107.
Businesses were asked to take meter readings before and after the weekend which meant they and we were able to monitor success. For example local company Designation used 23 per cent less electricity over the weekend than usual by turning off computers, printers and other equipment on Friday night.
Since the last Big Turn Off two years ago, when the council achieved 22 per cent savings in electricity use in the civic centre, an ongoing series of energy efficiency measures have been put in place with the result that our out of hours drop in use was smaller in the 2009 initiative.
In order to keep up the momentum the council is challenging businesses and individuals to switch off for Earth Hour on March 28th for one hour to send a message to global leaders to take action on climate change. The council will be repeating the Big Switch Off that weekend in addition. More information about this event can be found on the website" www.reading.gov.uk/earthhour
Procurement of a new Enveloping machine
Idea: To replace the 10+ year old enveloping machine with a new future-proofed version.
Results: After exhaustive research including meetings with external companies and demonstrations of various machines we secured a deal for a new enveloping machine complete with extra features (electronic height adjustable table, extra feeders, special feeder kit) for no more than the original amount budgeted. The result is a much improved service for internal customers - jobs completed in less than half the time and at half the cost, larger jobs can now be processed, a variety of formats (e.g. different sized envelopes and leaflets) can now be run through the machine, and the machine is future-proof and complete with the latest technology including OMR and bar coding.:
Leadership: Office Support team leader and Senior Office Support assistant proposed the need for a new machine, conducted the research and secured the optional extras at no extra cost.
Lessons Learnt: Updating essential technology can represent significant savings.
Contact: Paul Wood for further information (Email: pwood@winchester.gov.uk)
Thanks to Winchester City Council for this example.
Use of Touch Screen Technology
The idea: Idea to change from the old Eureka time recording programme to a new Touch Screen package. Eureka – involved writing down how long each job took on paper then inputting all data at the end of the month using complicated codes, for Accountancy to then recharge accordingly. Touch Screen – a programme accessible from a touch screen computer and desktop PCs. Allows officers to input data as and when they complete jobs, therefore allowing for more accurate time-keeping, and a less time-consuming system.
Results: The touch screen system has cut the amount of administration time significantly for each officer and for the team leader who can at the click of a button, run a report on a variety of different data. The touch screen also includes a dashboard feature giving a daily snapshot of the work undertaken in office support. It also is used to record statistical data including the quantity of incoming and outgoing post, and a postage stamp balance sheet.
Leadership: It was agreed that Eureka was taking too much time to complete and with Office Support being heavily involved the Retriever project time needed to be saved where ever possible. In a sit-down meeting between the Head of Customer Services, the Office Support team leader and Senior Office Support Assistant the idea was hashed out, IMT were then brought on board to design the software.
Lessons Learnt: Use of new technology can generate efficiencies and save time
Contact: Paul Wood for further details. (Email:pwood@winchester.gov.uk)
Thanks to Winchester City Council for this example.
BT One Bill.
The idea: To work with BT to replace the many bills that the Council receives monthly and quarterly for each of its telephones with one single monthly itemised bill supplied either by email or on disk.
Results: Reduction in the amount of time taken in administering the payments for each telephone bill and the cost of making the making payment. Reduction in the amount of paper used for the bills. Estimated annual saving of about £1,500
Leadership: This idea was initiated and led by the IM&T Team whose job it is to process and pay telephone invoices.
Lessons Learnt: That by working with suppliers, cost savings and efficiencies can be generated.
Thanks to Winchester City Council for this example.
Planning Public Notices in Winchester
The idea: To replace the printing onto regular paper and then laminating of planning public notices that are displayed outside a property to inform the public of a planning application with direct printing onto durable paper that can be used outside with no deterioration of quality or legibility of text.
Results: Reduction in the amount of time taken to print and laminate the public notices. The saving in cost by reducing the need to purchase expensive laminating pouches. There was a minimal cost increase in the cost of the paper.
Leadership: This idea was initiated and led by the Planning Team whose job it is to produce the notices.
Lessons Learnt: That there are more efficient and cost effective ways of carrying out some of the most simple of tasks
Contact: Simon Howson, Corporate Business Manager, (Email: showson@winchester.gov.uk)
Thanks to Winchester City Council for this example.
Two more examples from the New Forest
"Copier Paper/Furniture – These savings resulted through entering into joint procurement arrangements with Test Valley Borough Council for both photocopier paper and furniture.
Mobile Phone Contract – This saving was generated by renegotiation of the Council’s contract for mobile phones."
Thanks to New Forest District Council for these examples.
Catering Administration
24 March 2009
No longer...
- How come - what happened to the previous one? What went wrong - could nothing be done to keep it alive?
- And from where does the council now expect the ideas to emerge?
A regular cornucopia!
- Using water saving devices in toilet cisterns
- Reducing the number of waste bins per office
- Using the telephone holding system for advertising/promotion instead of playing music
- Monies from parking fines on taxi ranks go to Licensing budget
- Hold a bumper sale of surplus council items
- Charge for the replacement of lost bus passes
- All mailing lists should be split into internal and external recipients to avoid internal recipients being sent mail by external post
- Have one day a week with no internal emails
- Create themed guided walking tours of the town
- Provision of more recycling facilities in Council offices
- Include ‘Please consider the environment before printing this email’ at end of emails
- Make an administration charge for cheque payments that bounce, especially in respect of taxi/private hire drivers
- Selling off items of confiscated equipment that the Council takes possession of in noise nuisance cases
- Chevron style parking on larger roads and charging e.g. £1 per day for using the car parks out of the tourist season
- Installation of solar panels on council buildings
- Using waste paper bins as the default bin for recycled paper and each team having one bin for non-recyclable waste
- Promote a culture of organising and running training courses for other local authorities as a way of funding our training
- Promote NHS stop smoking services, smoking helpline and Together Programme more proactively
- Reduce number of offices required through working from home and hotdesking.
- Reduce number of receptions.
- The new Local Area Agreement should take the opportunity to include countywide performance targets with financial reward as in the 2003-06 PSA agreement
- Install movement detectors so that lights work automatically according to whether there are staff in an office, or install a cut out system after flexitime ends (already being done)
- All appropriate printers to have the double sided print option as a default setting to save paper (already being done)
- Eliminate lease cars and offer a cash alternative. Where a leased car is required, the council requires that these be dual powered/electric powered (hybrid) vehicles (already being done)
- Provision of more recycling facilities in Council offices
- Remove at least one large refuse bin from behind the Town Hall and replace with recycle bins
- Stop sending mail shots with pay slips
- Produce a council calendar
- Chipping felled tree branches and shrubs for footpaths & mulch
- Issue salary slips only when amount differs by £5 or more
- Have one central location on Intranet for procedure guides
- Have ‘recycle for xxxx’ & logo printed on envelopes
- Reduce temperature of hot water to sinks
- Use biro refills instead of ordering whole pen
- Send email version of termination form to Payroll
- That the document image processing system currently used by local taxation be used by the Council as a whole
- That a way be investigated into ensuring that the water flushing for urinals happens only when premises in use and not 24 hours a day, seven days a week
- That a consortium of bank staff be set up with other Councils
- That staff appraisals are programmed for January and February and training plans submitted by the end of February so that the training budget can be allocated by the end of March each year
- Instead of sending a remittance advice for officers expenses through the post, email it instead
- That the Council leases a suitable vehicle which can be driven to many locations in residential areas throughout the town and act as a mobile ‘bring site’
- That the radiators in the corridors at the Town Hall have thermostatic valves added to allow better control over the heating
- That staff are encouraged to turn off lights in meeting rooms once they are vacated i.e. with extra signage.
- That the notice board in the reception area at the Town Hall be replaced with an electronic TV style screen/monitor similar to that in the Registrars reception to display meetings etc
- That in areas where people are constantly walking in and out i.e. toilets, kitchen areas, store cupboards, that instead of a light being kept on all the time, light sensors be installed
- Mobility Scooter Drag Racing to ‘tie in’ with the ‘Go Fast’ event.
- Set up the property title reference number base so that when title reference numbers are required they are recorded, then the next time it is looked up, the Council need only pay £3.00 instead of £6.00 (Being investigated)
- That all waste paper be treated as confidential waste
- A free book exchange library
- To coincide with the opening of the Cultural Centre run a competition for staff to submit a piece of artwork that could be displayed in one of the galleries
- Have a VAT calculator on the Intranet so staff can input their gross and the net and VAT is worked out for them. We could also have a section to input what category the item purchased is under to insure that it is a vatable cost
- That staff with mobile phones on the same network make free calls to each other and mobile phone numbers are displayed on the Intranet.
- That instead of having a photo ID/warrant card, swipe card and name badge, these are amalgamated into one card
- Could junk email be stopped at the post room and returned enmasse with a delete from mailing list request.
- Provision of online resources i.e. email, intranet, internet and other services in meeting rooms.
- Instead of the Council leasing vans it would be more beneficial to buy them.
- More students could be used to fill posts at less cost.
- Use alcohol gel hand sanitizer instead of soap, water, paper towels or dryers in toilets and kitchens.
- Use only envelopes without windows and print addresses onto envelopes or labels instead so they can be recycled.
Centre for Public Innovation
23 March 2009
Safety & mirrors
"Recent serious criminal incidents in one of our local car parks had led to a security team being employed to patrol the area. However the layout of one car park stairwell was such that it did not allow great visibility either on the stairwell itself or through the doors connecting to the parking levels. We therefore introduced mirrors on each of the levels to allow users to see what was round corners and placed visibility panels in the doors to the parking levels.
Ceilings throughout the car park were simultaneously painted in highly reflective white to enhance overall light levels. Since these installations people have confirmed they feel less intimidated, and more safe."
Thanks
Win-win-win cardboard recycling
"During a recent inspection of a local food manufacturer, one member of staff noticed piles and piles of cardboard packaging waste, although this was not part of their job they advised the company to contact a recycling company to take the packaging away. Having researched recycling options the company e-mailed the council to say thanks for the initial idea. They are likely to save between £15,000 and £20,000 per year by recycling their waste cardboard.
By being in the right place at the right time, by asking questions and making connections between two issues, we were able to get a very positive result from what started out as a routine inspection."
Thanks.
Saving on cheques
"Traditionally the Council paid its suppliers by cheque. Taking into account the time spent printing and enveloping each payment, the cost of the cheque stationery and the envelope in which it was posted, as well as the actual price of the stamp and the fee from the bank, every time we paid a supplier it would cost roughly 53p.
What we've now done is moved to BACS as our default method of payment. In the past there were a couple of things which put us off doing this. Firstly, there would be a need to contact our suppliers to find out their bank details and convince them that electronic payment was the way forward. Secondly, in order to minimise subsequent queries, we thought that we would still post remittance advices to the suppliers telling them that payment was on its way - this, of course, would negate some of the saving.
However, times have moved on and most suppliers now include bank details on their invoices and request electronic payment. Very often email addresses are printed on invoices as well. All this meant that we could readily move over to BACS payment for very many of our suppliers, with remittance advices sent by email. Obtaining the missing information from other suppliers was simply a question of making a few phone calls. We are now making 83% of our supplier payments by BACS and emailing the remittances. In a year we make around 11,000 payments, so we will now be saving around £4,000 annually"
Thanks.
20 March 2009
Range of savings & improvements from Amber Valley Borough Council
1. Deployment of Voice over IP telephony at the Council's 3 remote sites £2,012 per annum
2. Replacement of telephony system - reduction in maintenance costs for a more functional system £3,040 per annum
3. Maintenance of printers - rationalisation of brand of printer to ensure reliable model and minimum number of cartridges and spare parts are required to be held in stock £6,500 per annum
4. Increase in the number of electronic payments received resulting in a reduction in the number of security cash collections £6,200 per annum
5. Introduction of TFT screens - reduction in power usage £1,230 per annum
6. Re-design of flexi time system administration arrangements to reduce the volume of changes required £5,900 per annum (Non cashable)
7. Re-design of the flexi time system to reduce the time taken to input the changes required £3,400 per annum (Non cashable)
Thanks for these examples.
19 March 2009
Saving postage and time on minutes
Emailing people - top tips
- When replying to emails - put your answers next to the questions in the original email - this saves time describing which question you are answering - indeed a function can be switched on such that your additions come with your initials automatcially
- Use the subject line of emails to indicate the response (if any) that you want. So a 'fyi' in the title is just that - for your information - no reply required.
- When making an appointment with someone outside the organisation - use 'outlook' to place it in their diary too - as 'outlook' has this functionality. This means you can track their response too. (Very useful with partnership working)
FoI - How to respond with triage
Annual Efficiency Statements - a good place to start!
- The Forward Look was for authorities to set out their general strategy for making efficiency gains; an estimate of the value of new gains expected to be achieved during the forthcoming financial year; and the key actions planned to realise them.
- The Backward Look was for authorities to set out the value of ongoing gains sustained from previous years; the value of new efficiency gains actually achieved during that financial year; and the actions that were undertaken to release them.
18 March 2009
E-Christmas Card
Bikes for Work
Double Sided Printing - to reduce the paper mountain
12 March 2009
21st Century Target Setting
I wrote this article nearly six years ago - it still seems valid - particularly in the light current trends to move away from huge numbers of top down imposed targets. I hope the links still work.
Introduction
Many public service leaders and commentators are expressing increasing disquiet about the current approach to target setting for the public services.
David Batty writing in the Guardian (26/4/02) about the Victoria Climbié Enquiry entitled his piece ‘Performance targets compromise child protection’. Onora O’Neill speaking in the BBC Reith Lectures last year said ‘our revolution in accountability has not reduced attitudes of mistrust, but rather reinforced a culture of suspicion… we are galloping towards central planning by performance indicators reinforced by obsessions with blame and compensation’. A Telegraph headline of 19 December 2001 said ‘NHS patients were duped in waiting list fiddle’. Simon Caulkin in the Observer (5/8/01) declared that management ‘being tied to set goals is so often meaningless’ and can ‘lead to disaster’.
Dr Ian Bogle, retiring from five years as Chair of the BMA in June 2003 said 'I am absolutely appalled by the cheating going on and by the Government having put human beings in such a position that they feel that to preserve their jobs [they must do it]. The pressures are obscene and the Government should be ashamed of itself for the consequences.'[1]
And recently (and strikingly) James Strachan the new Chairman of the Audit Commission went on record to say to MPs: "The problem we have faced time and time again is the slavish devotion to targets, many of which have not been set very intelligently. It's a surefire way of not getting improvement in public services. People see targets set by government, monitored by them, and with responsibility for their validation. There is a real danger that people will not believe them," [2]
It seems therefore that people are becoming increasingly aware that the current performance management regime is not delivering the hoped for improvements in outcomes desired by the Government, the staff and managers who work in the public services and, indeed, the public themselves. This article is about another way – a way whereby the various levels of Government can still hold the public services to account for delivering results – as they most surely should – whilst tackling some of the difficulties with the current approach. As the voices for change become louder – it is vitally important that we do not ‘throw the baby out with the bathwater’ and reject target setting in all its forms. What we need is an evolution of thinking & practice – although that is not to say that some of the new ideas necessary should not be radical in their own right.
Targets and performance management are now so pervasive and influence at a very deep level how we conceptualise achievement in the public services – it is difficult to remember – what was the problem that performance management was meant to be solution for? This article will begin with an overview of the arguments against target setting and performance management in its current form. Further into the article, the way forward to a 21st Century form of target setting is outlined.
It is hoped that this article will not only add to the clamour for a change in performance management practice but also offer some practical ideas for what is now required.
The key arguments
To summarise briefly the key arguments against target setting and performance management in its current form:
- Targets are rarely set with anything other than a nod toward a statistical analysis of trends in performance of the system or service in question and there is little awareness of natural and special causes of variation in performance day-to-day, month-to-month, year on year. This can lead to reacting to changes that are merely part of an ordinary variation and sometimes not reacting when one is called for. Also a lack of dynamic statistical analyses can generate unrealistic targets.
- Outcomes are difficult to measure – by their very nature – so instead performance indicators (PI’s) are defined and targets set accordingly. These PI’s then become the objects for achievement rather than the outcomes themselves.
- Partly because targets are usually imposed (rather than developed in collaboration with the service providers and users) and partly by their very nature, targets can unfortunately foster ignoble or perverse attempts to hit the targets by whatever means are required (as past news stories around hospital waiting lists would appear to illustrate).
- Target setting and performance management only works when the system that is (or is not) delivering to target performance is understandable and understood such that interventions can be made that will change performance in the right direction. Without such understanding – requirements to improve performance can degenerate into ineffective exhortations to work harder, faster or better etc.
- Target setting and performance management introduces a level of fear into work – a fear which can damage service delivery. Sometimes target setting is perceived as a form of bullying. When targets are not met – it is unfortunately too often the case that individuals are held culpable when in most cases it is the system itself, which has failed (in usually many places). Targets tend to foster ‘quick fixes’ rather than system (or ‘stay’) fixes.
- By focussing public servants and services upon targets and inspecting or appraising them against those targets – the targets become hugely important. When the targets do not reflect the local needs and wants of the public – target setting can distract people from giving the levels of service that they wish to give and the public want.
- Target setting and performance management can become a substitute for visionary and inspirational leadership. Management can too easily descend into ‘bean counting’ the PI’s and ‘double thinking’ leadership that pretends that all the targets really do matter – when in truth only a few key ones are of critical importance.
- Inspecting services against targets is too late, expensive and ineffective – it is in effect allowing services to deliver ineffective services rather than encouraging them to create systems for continuous improvement. Targets can foster ‘downstream’ measures of quality whereas it is much more effective to focus ‘upstream’ and assess where in the chain of actions things go right or wrong.
- Targets are by their very nature time focussed – often on a very short timescale. Most of the systems and issues wrestled with by the public services take years – if not decades – to come about. Improvement needs to work on that same timescale. In other words it’s a bit like having a speedometer that tells you what speed you were doing half an hour ago.
- The resources that go into setting targets and then responding to being held to account for the achievement of those targets are all resources that could be spent on delivering services and achieving outcomes. Balancing quite how many resources should go into setting and assessing against targets is a very hard task.
- Target setting and performance management often pitch one organisation against another, one individual against another when partnership and collaboration would be a much more effective strategy. Many local partnerships – endeavouring to make ‘joined up government’ work on the ground – find that the targets set by different parts of Whitehall make their task harder rather than easier.
- People – the public, the public service professionals, the politicians - know all these flaws above and as a consequence – because of the overarching importance attached to targets in their current form – become dissociated from their work and often lose their inherent ability to be passionate, creative and committed to their work and what they are trying to achieve.
This article is not just be about what is wrong –set out below are some practical proposals about what needs to happen to deliver sustainable social results, continuous improvement in those results, value for money and accountability. These proposals have been assembled into a 20 point plan for change:
- There must a more widespread use of statistical process control[3] and general statistical methods to really understand how public service systems operate. (At the very least – matrices of performance data with more than nine cells should be banned in favour of performance data being presented graphically.)
- The aim in monitoring performance should be to understand and seek to control variation in performance – as far as is possible in the complex systems that contribute to social outcomes. It is vital to avoid responding to variations which trend analysis shows are merely ‘ordinary’ variation and to ensure there is a response to ‘special’ causes of variation.
- When considering what may be causing the variations in social results, practices need to be boosted that affirm the need to search truly creatively and rigorously – without (moral, historical, political etc) assumptions. Coupled to this is must be stressed that aiming for ‘what works’ is not a utilitarian recipe for focussing only on ends and forgetting the means to get there – often the public remember the means far more than the ends!
- There needs to be far more education for the practitioners, managers, politicians and media in understanding variation and system improvement.
- Government and management at all levels need to involve practitioners, users and other key stakeholders far more, in the search for PI’s that come closer to assessing progress towards desired for outcomes
- We need processes / events / conferences / meetings / written communication / website bulletin boards to achieve much greater understanding and commitment to the outcomes being sought
- Key leaders need to assert every opportunity to emphasise that PI’s are indicators – nothing more nothing less!
- The balance between ‘top down’ and ‘bottom up’ target setting needs to shift more towards trusting and allowing the front line organisations – who are delivering the outcomes – to set their own targets. They must then be held to account for meeting their own targets and being committed to continuous improvement, contributing to outcomes and putting in place leadership and systems that deliver ever better results for their users and other stakeholders.
- More research is needed to help each system to understand itself – informed by statistical understanding of variations in performance, the wit & experience of all those involved in providing the service and comparisons to other organisations. Under the title of evidence based practice – more is needed to find out just what are the actual mechanisms or interventions that actually deliver results. What are the differences in practice that really deliver different (and better) results?
- When anyone – as a politician, manager or practitioner – intervenes in system, it is vital to understand what are the aims and evaluate the result against this. Knowing whether the result was achieved or not is also not enough – one has to understand why it was or was not achieved – reflective practice must be the order of the day. This is as much a proposal for government ministers as it is for doctors as it is for waste recycling managers as it is for crown court judges. Everyone needs to know (and have measures to validate self knowledge) – ‘is what I am doing working and indeed – am I doing it better than last year’?
- It must never be forgotten that probably most of the systems that deliver social results are extraordinarily complex and it is rarely the case that one individual (the senior manager or director or middle manager) has all the knowledge required to make the best possible decision. The ‘manager’s right to manage’ should be interpreted as the manager’s right to ensure the system is well managed – by all those involved. In our increasingly complex world, participative management is not a ‘nice to do’ but a ‘need to do’. Whole system approaches need to be more widely used.
- To repeat and emphasise one of Deming’s (see the acknowledgements below for a reference) fourteen points – drive out fear! In a workplace – fear can lead towards unforeseen and negative consequences.
- Everyone knows that quick fixes do not work – just as it is widely known a rush DIY job will eventually (if not sooner than that) come round to haunt the DIYer. Leaders must do all that they can to encourage the use intelligence, resources and skills and so engender a culture of practice that is increasingly and robustly working towards stay fix approaches to improvement being the usual approach.
- There needs to be more recognition that often positive social outcomes cannot be measured in only quantitative ways – a person, a community, a town or country might just feel or look different. At a subjective level – it might be recognised – but at an objective level it cannot be bottled or counted. Simply people saying – ‘its better round here now’ – might be the most profound result that could have been achieved. In other words our indicators of performance and achievement must be a balance of the qualitative and quantitative.
- We need far more hands on inspirational leadership from every echelon of the public service – leadership that co-creates a vision of the results we need and the commitment to achieve these – working together across the divides between national and local government, different agencies, the statutory and voluntary sectors and (most importantly) between the public themselves and the public service practitioners and managers.
- Often far too many resources are put into making small improvements in existing service delivery systems where what is required a radical overhaul and replacement – where quality and a profound commitment is built in from the start – rather than bolted on at the end. We need more courage to stop investing in ‘tweaking’ and inspecting existing organisations and more investing in designing new and imaginative forms of service delivery – co-designed with the public, underpinned by electronic means of service delivery and run on the energy of public service commitment.
- While the argument about whether targets work or not will rage on well past this article, it is now well established that short term targets do not work very well at all. The society that we have now is the product of generations and historical trends – there are no short term methods for the sustainable reduction in gun crime (for example). Obviously Governments are driven to improve matters – and are held to account for delivering those improvements – but the promises made need to be visionary and improvements in crime, education, health, the environment etc – all take time. The media in particular needs to understand this.
- Whatever efforts we put into system and service improvement, we must measure the benefits of those efforts. The resources consumed by preparing for and responding to inspections need to be measured. The time it takes to measure progress against targets needs to be measured. The amount of resources used to analyse the system and deliver stay fix improvements also needs to be audited. But above all – public service organisations need to have far more robust systems for assessing the costs of not investing in improvement – as these costs are often overlooked and skew the appraisal of whether it is worth investing in a new form of service delivery or system improvement.
- Problems ensue when different parts of Whitehall impose targets that do not add up on the ground. As many frontline practitioners know – delivering genuinely joined up services on the ground is seriously hampered by the apparent lack of coordination at the most senior levels of Government. Efforts are being made (the Social Exclusion Unit stands proud in this respect as mentioned above) – but efforts need to be redoubled again and again.
- Finally there needs to be ways to move beyond ‘bean counting’ and beyond the presumption that targets can whip the public services into shape. All dimensions of the public services need to pursue
- measurement that helps services to improve - demonstrably
- leadership that inspires such improvement
- an end to parochialism
- supporting the public services – with all the energy and commitment of those who work in them
- really, really listening to the public and acting on what their informed judgments are telling us about what they want improved and how to go about it
Old fashioned accountability around annual reports was never enough. Target setting of the kinds we are appear to be suffering from now are not working. We now need a third way – as outlined in the 20 point plan above.
30 June 2003
Acknowledgements
Much of this analysis above is not new and can be traced to the work of W. Edwards Deming. Deming was one the key progenitors of the modern quality movement and remains hugely influential to this day. An internet search on his name will yield numerous websites dedicated to communicating his philosophy as set out in his is famous ’14 Points’ (see Out of the Crisis, 1986).
[1] (Full report http://politics.guardian.co.uk/publicservices/story/0,11032,987365,00.html) 29/6/03
[2] (Full report http://politics.guardian.co.uk/publicservices/story/0,11032,871947,00.html) 10/1/03
[3] See ‘SPC in the Office’ by Mal Owen & John Morgan. (June 2000) Greenfield Publishing; ISBN: 0952332841) for an accessible explanation of SPC and how to apply it to performance.
11 March 2009
Two ideas from joined up justice
Graffiti Removal
Criminal Justice agencies moved into a new Justice Centre in Warwickshire where they are collocated, this has lead to many significant measurable benefits, however, there has been some other significant and unforeseen benefits. A Police Inspector on his way to work early in the morning noticed that numerous street signs had been subject to graffiti. Since working at the Centre he has learnt about the un paid work scheme run from the centre by Probation for offenders to undertake work in the community. He contacted their manager and told him about the graffiti, before the end of the day the graffiti was removed by offenders as part of the unpaid work scheme at no cost and prevented a spiral of decline in the neighbourhood..
Shared Resources
On moving into the Centre other agencies such as Probation and Youth Offending Service became aware that the video link between the Courts, Prisons and remand Centres were not fully utilised, as a result of the multi agency arrangements, Probation and other agencies have been able to utilise the facility to interview offenders in prison, thus saving time and money in travelling to interview them in Prison and on Remand
Encouraging staff to learn about the resources and services used by other similar agencies enables more efficient ways of working and solving problems.
(With thanks to Richard Lyttle who provided these examples: Richard.Lyttle@warwickshire.pnn.police.uk)